- Home
- Tested by a Bogey Golfer
- Testing Training Aids
The Cheap Golf Training Aids I Actually Tested (So You Don't Have To Guess)
Mike asked me why my garage has a shoebox full of golf gadgets I never use twice. Alignment sticks with the paint scraped off one end. A tempo trainer that beeped exactly nine times before it went in a drawer. A putting mirror I stepped on once, barefoot, at 6am, and have not fully forgiven. I didn't have a great answer for him, so I started keeping better track of which ones actually earned their spot in my bag and which ones just earned a spot in the shoebox.
The chipped paint on those sticks is from four Augusts of leaning them against the cart, not from actually working.
Most cheap golf training aids do work for something — just not the something the packaging promises. The ones worth keeping give you an honest, immediate answer to a question you couldn't otherwise answer on your own, like whether your feet are actually aligned or where you really made contact. The ones worth skipping just ask you to trust a gadget instead of paying attention to your own swing. Give any of them at least two weeks of real use before you judge them — not one range session and a shrug.
I'm not chasing a lower handicap with any of this, or not only that. I'm chasing the point where I stop swinging in the dark, guessing at what my body's actually doing out there. That's the whole Golfeaser deal — you improve the experience, not just the scorecard — and sometimes that means a $12 mirror does more for a Tuesday-night range session than a $400 driver will ever do for a Saturday round.
This page is the hub for that project: every training aid I've actually put through a real test, what I tested it against, and the honest verdict on each one. New tests get added here as I run them. If you're the kind of golfer who's bought something off a golf Instagram ad at 11pm and felt a little foolish about it later — you're exactly who this is for.
Why a Bogey Golfer Bothers Testing $15 Gadgets
Here's the thing nobody talks about: most golf content assumes you're either a beginner buying your first set or a low single-digit grinding for scratch. Almost nothing is written for the guy in between — a 17 to 22 handicap who plays once a week, has forty-five minutes at the range on a good Thursday, and wants to know if the $18 thing his buddy swears by is worth the drawer space.
I've been that guy for twenty-five years. I've bought things because a low-single-digit friend told me they worked for him, forgetting that he practices four times a week and I practice zero. I bought a swing plane trainer in 2019 because a guy at the range was using one and looked serious about it. I used it twice. It's still in the shoebox.
The insight, once I actually paid attention: a training aid's value has almost nothing to do with what the low-handicap guys say about it, and almost everything to do with whether it fits how much you actually practice. A tool that requires four sessions a week to show results is not a tool for a once-a-week golfer, no matter how well it worked for the scratch player who recommended it. The right question isn't "does this work" — it's "does this work for someone who plays like I actually play."
That's principle one of being a weekend golfer, as far as I'm concerned: you're a different breed with different constraints, and pretending otherwise is how a shoebox fills up with $15 mistakes. Fellow Golfeasers, this whole cluster of pages exists because somebody has to test this stuff against a real Tuesday-night practice schedule instead of a Tour pro's.
So here's what changed. I stopped buying based on who recommended it and started buying based on one question: can I realistically use this the way it's meant to be used, given my actual week? Everything below got tested against that standard, not against whether it looked impressive in a five-second video.
How I Actually Test These Things
What counts as a real test here? Two weeks minimum, used at least three times in that window, on the range or the practice green — never just unboxed and photographed for a page. If an aid claims to fix something specific (alignment, tempo, contact point), I check whether that specific thing measurably changed, not whether I generally "felt good" using it, because "felt good" is how half the shoebox got filled in the first place.
Why two weeks and not one range session? Because almost anything feels novel and useful in session one. The real test is whether it's still telling you something useful in session six, after the novelty's worn off and you're back to your actual habits. A tool that only works while you're paying extra-close attention isn't teaching you anything — it's just a temporary crutch, and crutches don't travel with you to the course.
🔧 The Testing Rules I Actually Follow
- ⭐ Minimum two weeks, at least three sessions, before any verdict gets written down
- 🎯 Judged against the one specific thing it claims to fix — not a general "did I like it"
- 💰 Priced against what I actually paid — no manufacturer's sample pricing
- ⛳ Checked for carryover — does it change anything on the course, or only on the range
I also weigh cost against what it's replacing. A $10 roll of impact tape competing against a free tip from a buddy is a different value question than a $40 tempo trainer competing against one thirty-minute lesson. That's the same logic I use when I'm deciding whether playing smart on a bad day beats trying to force a swing change mid-round — you're always weighing the cost of the fix against what you actually get back. You'll see that comparison show up directly in a couple of these — one test literally puts a $30 gadget up against a real lesson to see which one earns its money.
The Buying Mistake That Fills Most Golf Garages
Dave's take on all this, the last time it came up in the parking lot, was that training aids are just a tax on hope — you buy the thing, you feel briefly optimistic, and then real life and a forty-five-minute practice window take over. He's not entirely wrong, and I don't think the aids themselves are the problem.
The actual mistake, in my case and in most of the shoebox's contents, happens before the swing ever gets involved. It's buying the aid at the moment of maximum frustration — three-putted twice in one round, drove home annoyed, ordered something at 11pm that promised to fix it by the weekend. That's the worst possible time to buy a training aid, because you're not evaluating whether it fits your practice habits. You're buying relief from a bad Saturday, and relief doesn't care what the return policy says.
The tempo trainer is the clearest example of this pattern in my own testing. I didn't buy it because I'd researched tempo work and decided I needed it. I bought it the Tuesday after a round where I rushed every transition on the front nine and knew it. It sat almost unused for three weeks before I actually built a routine around it — and only then did it start telling me anything useful. Same product, same price, wildly different outcome depending on when and why I bought it.
The fix isn't complicated, even if it's a little unsatisfying: wait a week after the bad round before you buy anything. If you still want the training aid once the frustration's worn off — because you've actually thought through when you'd use it, not just how good it would feel to fix things right now — it's a much better bet. Almost everything in the shoebox failed the "still wanted it a week later" test. The four aids on this page, mostly, passed it.
The Four Training Aids I've Tested So Far
Four down, more coming. Here's the short version of each — click through to any one for the full test, what I actually did, and the honest number I'd put on it.
Alignment sticks. The cheapest, most boring-looking thing on this list, and also the one I still use monthly. A month with them on the ground for every range session changed something I genuinely didn't expect. Full test: I Tested Alignment Sticks for a Month: The Honest Verdict.
The putting mirror. The one that made me question whether my read of my own stroke had been wrong for years. Whether it "fixes" anything depends entirely on what you think is broken to begin with. Full test: The Putting Mirror: Does It Actually Fix Anything.
Impact tape. Ten dollars, a roll about the size of a hockey puck, and the single most honest piece of feedback on this entire list — because it doesn't have an opinion, it just shows you exactly where the ball actually left the face. Full test: Impact Tape: A $10 Training Aid That's Actually Honest With You.
The tempo trainer. This is the one I pitted directly against a real, paid lesson, because $30 for a gadget and $30 for thirty minutes with a pro are two very different bets on the same problem — the kind of question I get into more directly in are golf lessons worth it for a bogey golfer. Full test: The $30 Tempo Trainer vs. One Real Lesson.
More tests get added to this list as they're finished — check back, or better yet, join the list below and I'll tell you when a new one goes up.
What Training Aids Actually Change (and What They Don't)
A buddy of mine, Jim, once told me his rangefinder "fixed his short game." It hadn't fixed anything. It had told him more accurate numbers, which let him make slightly better decisions, which occasionally led to a better result. That's a real improvement. It is not the same thing as fixing a swing.
That distinction is the whole story with training aids, once you actually watch what happens across a few of these tests instead of judging each in isolation. Some of them change information — they tell you something true about what you're doing that you couldn't see or feel on your own. Impact tape does this. A putting mirror does this. They don't touch your swing mechanics directly; they just remove a layer of guessing.
Others try to change behavior directly, usually through repetition or forced positioning — alignment sticks nudging your setup into a consistent spot, a tempo trainer trying to retrain the rhythm of your swing through repeated audio cues. These work slower and need more sessions to show anything, because you're not just getting information, you're trying to build a new habit on top of twenty years of an old one.
None of them change your swing while you're not using them. That's the part the marketing conveniently skips. The mirror doesn't come to the course with you. The tempo trainer doesn't beep during your Saturday round. Whatever these tools teach you has to survive the transfer from "using the aid" to "playing without it," and that transfer is where most of the shoebox failures actually happened — not because the aid was bad, but because I never gave it enough reps to survive without training wheels.
A few of these don't sort neatly into one category or the other, and alignment sticks are the best example. On paper they're an information tool — they show you where your feet and shoulders actually are, which most of us get wrong by more than we'd guess. But leave them down every single range session for a month and they quietly become a habit tool too, because your body starts expecting that visual reference even when it isn't there. That's probably the real reason they're the one thing from this whole project that's still in my bag instead of the shoebox — they do both jobs at once, and neither one asks much of you.
Can You Even Use These During a Real Round?
No — and this trips people up more than you'd think. Rule 4.3 of the Rules of Golf prohibits using an artificial device or unusual piece of equipment to help you make a stroke or décide how to play one, and that covers most training aids directly: alignment sticks laid on the ground, tempo devices, impact-feedback tools, even a level used to read a green. Break it once and it's a two-stroke penalty in stroke play, or loss of hole in match play. Break it again and you're out.
The practical version: everything on this list is a range and practice-green tool, full stop. None of it comes out during an actual round with your group, and honestly, that's fine — the whole point of testing them is building something that's already in your hands and your habits before you ever get to the first tee. A training aid you're still leaning on mid-round hasn't finished doing its job yet.
I'll admit I didn't know this rule cold until I looked it up for this page. I'm not totally sure why it never came up before — probably because none of my group has ever been playing anything close to a real competition. But it's worth knowing before you're the guy laying an alignment stick down on 14 in your club's member-guest and getting a very polite, very final explanation from the rules committee.
The Training Aids Worth Buying vs. the Ones Worth Skipping
Here's the split, once you look at cost against what it actually teaches you.
Worth buying: anything under $20 that gives you direct, honest feedback the instant you do something — impact tape telling you exactly where you struck it, a mirror showing your actual setup instead of the one you imagine you have. These are cheap enough that even a mediocre result doesn't sting, and the feedback loop is immediate enough that you don't need four sessions a week to benefit. Alignment sticks land here too, mostly because they're nearly impossible to use wrong.
Worth skipping — or at least being honest with yourself about: anything that asks you to build a new habit through repetition alone, priced at $30 or more, unless you can genuinely commit to using it three or more times a week for a month. The tempo trainer isn't a bad product. It's a product that needs a practice schedule most weekend golfers don't have, and buying it without that schedule is how it ends up exactly where the swing plane trainer ended up in my garage.
If you'd rather skip the gadget question altogether, that's a legitimate answer too — I took a golf lesson so you don't have to covers what a single session with a pro actually nets you, without any of this buy-it-and-hope math. And if you're shopping for someone else rather than yourself, the cheap end of this list doubles as a genuinely good gift — a roll of impact tape or a mirror is a better stocking stuffer than most of what's in golf gifts under $50 for weekend golfers, mostly because the person receiving it will actually use it more than once.
I ran every one of the four tests above through roughly this logic before I even bought them, and it's held up better than most of my actual swing decisions.
What This Whole Training Aid Experiment Boils Down To
I'm one round away from a better Tuesday-night practice session, same as always — the point was never a lower handicap, it was fewer $18 mistakes and more evenings where the range time actually meant something.
⛳ What This Testing Project Has Taught Me So Far
- ✅ Feedback-based aids under $20 are the safest bets — tape, mirrors, anything that shows rather than tells
- 🚫 Habit-building aids over $30 only pay off if your actual practice schedule can support them
- ⭐ Two weeks minimum before any verdict — one range session tells you almost nothing
- 💰 None of it is legal to use mid-round under Rule 4.3 — this is range and practice-green work only
- 💡 The gadget's job is to close once you don't need it anymore — if you're still leaning on it in month three, that's useful information too
🏌️ Got a Golf Story?
Share it with us. Every story we publish earns the author a free copy of The Weekend Golfer's Social Playbook — our three-step system for finding your people, running trips that actually come together, and earning the right to brag at the 19th hole.
Or join the Golfeasers — free weekly content for people like us.
Training Aid Questions Worth Answering Before You Buy Anything
Are golf training aids actually worth it for a high handicapper? Some are, and it depends entirely on the type. Feedback-based aids under $20 — impact tape, alignment sticks, a putting mirror — tend to earn their price fast because they show you something true without asking for a big time commitment. Habit-building aids that cost more and need repeated use are a worse bet unless your practice schedule can actually support them.
Can you use a training aid during an actual round of golf? No. Rule 4.3 of the Rules of Golf prohibits using artificial devices or unusual equipment to help you make or plan a stroke, which covers alignment sticks, tempo trainers, impact-feedback tools, and similar aids. First breach is a two-stroke penalty in stroke play or loss of hole in match play; a second breach is disqualification. These are range and practice-green tools only.
What's the cheapest training aid that's actually helped? Impact tape, without much competition. It costs under $15 for a roll that lasts months, and it doesn't ask you to interpret anything — it just shows you exactly where the ball left the clubface, which is more honest feedback than most instruction gives you for free.
How long should you actually test a training aid before deciding if it works? At least two weeks and three real sessions, not one range visit. Almost anything feels useful the first time you try it — the real test is whether it's still telling you something new by the sixth session, after the novelty's gone.
Do training aids work if you're not also taking lessons? Some do, some don't — and that's exactly the comparison in one of the tests linked above, where a $30 tempo trainer goes head-to-head with a single paid lesson to see which one actually moves the needle for a bogey golfer's money.
More From the Bogey Golfer Testing Lab
- Tested by a Bogey Golfer (hub) — every honest test on the site, all in one place
- I Tried the Viral Swing Tip for 30 Days — the other kind of gadget-free experiment
- What Clubs Do You Actually Need? The Minimalist Bogey Bag
- What I've Tested, Ranked
- What a Real 20-Handicap's Stats Actually Look Like
Johnny is a 25-year weekend golfer who's double-booked tee times, forgotten his clubs an hour from the course, and made pretty much every other trip-planning mistake there is — so you don't have to. Guided by The Golfeaser Manifesto, he started Golfeaser.com to prove that weekend golfers are a special, funnier breed who improve the experience, not just the scorecard. He's also the guy behind The Weekend Golfer's Social Playbook — a three-step system for finding your people, running trips that actually come together, and earning the right to brag at the 19th hole.
