- Home
- Tested by a Bogey Golfer
- Strategy Tests
- I Played to the 150 Marker All Round for a Month
I Played to the 150 Marker on Every Hole for a Month — Here's What Actually Happened
Dave asked me on the 6th tee why I'd just hit 3-wood on a hole he knows I can reach with driver. I didn't have an answer he'd accept in the time it takes to re-tee, so I said "trust me" and hit it 210 down the left side, short of the fairway bunkers, leaving a number I actually liked. He shook his head and hit driver anyway. He was in the bunker by the time I found my ball.
Four Saturdays of aiming for a number in the fairway instead of the flag — and not once checking the scorecard until the 19th hole.
Playing to the 150-yard marker means choosing your tee shot, layup, or club specifically so your approach shot lands from a full, comfortable distance — for most bogey golfers, that's a full swing with something like an 8-iron — instead of whatever number the hole happens to leave you. I spent a month doing this on every hole where I had any real control over the outcome, forcing myself to play for a number instead of a result. It didn't fix my golf game. It fixed about a third of my bad holes, which turned out to be plenty.
There's a real conflict buried in that decision, and I felt it every time I made it. I hit long drives down the fairway, or at least I chase the feeling of the one towering drive I get most rounds, and there's a genuine jolt of joy in it. Laying back on purpose, on a hole I could obviously reach, felt like giving that up by choice. It took most of the month to realize you can keep the occasional big swing and still play smarter on the holes that don't need one.
What Is the 150-Marker Strategy, Exactly?
Every course marks distance to the center of the green somehow — a painted stake, a disc set into the fairway, a sprinkler head with a number stamped on the cap. The 150 marker is just the most common one, because it splits most courses roughly in half and it's the number a lot of mid-handicappers can hit with a full, non-defensive swing.
The strategy is simple to say and harder to actually do: pick your club off the tee, and your layup club on par 5s, based on what number it leaves you — not on how far you can hit it. If driver puts you at an awkward in-between yardage, you don't hit driver. If a 3-wood or hybrid leaves you a full swing at your favorite iron, that's the club, even if it feels like giving something up.
Take a 400-yard par 4. Driver, if I catch it, leaves me somewhere between 170 and 190 — a number I don't trust, that isn't quite a full 6-iron and isn't quite a soft 5. A 3-wood off that same tee, hit nowhere near as far, leaves 150 almost every time. One of those numbers I hit green more often than not. The other one I'm guessing.
This is one entry in a longer run of course-management experiments under playing smart when you're not playing well — the whole idea being that a 20-handicapper has more to gain from better decisions than from a better swing.
Why I Picked 150 Specifically
The 6th at our course is a 410-yard dogleg with water short right of the green, the kind of hole where the smart play and the satisfying play have never once agreed with each other. I've hit into that pond more times than I've admitted to Dave. What finally got me to stop wasn't a lesson or a tip — it was noticing, over a few range sessions, that my 8-iron was the one club I never doubted mid-swing.
Everybody's number is different, and it's worth finding your own before you copy mine. My 8-iron carries somewhere close to 150 on a normal day, so that became my target. If your most trusted full swing is a 7-iron or a 9, your number is whatever that club carries — the marker itself doesn't matter, the reliability does. The point isn't the number 150. It's picking one number and building the whole hole around getting there, which tracks with what a real 20-handicap's stats actually look like — the strokes get lost on the mishit, in-between shots, not the ones you already trust.
How Do You Find Your Own Number?
You don't need a launch monitor for this, just one honest range session and a notepad. Hit ten balls with each iron you carry, ignore the best and worst of each group, and write down where the middle six actually landed — not what the box on the shaft says, not what your buddy's 7-iron does, what yours does on an average swing.
The club that produces the tightest cluster, not the longest average, is your number. For me that's the 8-iron — it's not my longest iron by a stretch, but it's the one where a bad swing still finishes on the green instead of the front fringe or the back bunker. Most bogey golfers find their number sits somewhere between a 7-iron and a pitching wedge, which is exactly why the 150 marker works as a rough industry-wide stand-in even though almost nobody's real number lands on it precisely.
Do this once a season, not once ever. Swing speeds change with the weather, with how much you've played that month, even with how much sleep you got the night before a Saturday round. The number isn't sacred — it's just the best current answer to "which club do I trust with my eyes closed," and that answer drifts. If you're still not sure which clubs you actually need in the bag in the first place, sort that out before you sort out your number — you can't trust a club you don't carry.
The Rules I Set for Myself
I didn't want this to turn into a vague intention I abandoned by the 4th hole, so I wrote down four rules before the first round and stuck to them for all four Saturdays.
🎯 The 150-Marker Rules for the Round
- ⛳ Every tee shot's job is to leave my number — not to go as far as possible
- 🚫 If driver leaves an awkward yardage, driver stays in the bag, no exceptions and no arguing with myself on the tee
- ✅ Par 3s under 150 yards don't count — normal club selection applies, this is a tee-and-layup rule only
- 🔧 On par 5s, the only job of the layup is to leave my number to the green, not to get as close as possible
- 💡 If the hole is too long to reach my number in regulation, the plan gets dropped for that hole entirely — no forcing it
That last rule mattered more than I expected going in. Some holes simply don't offer a version of this plan, and the fastest way to ruin the experiment was pretending they did. If you're still working out which club to use for which shot in general, this plan hands you one less decision to make on approach — you already know the answer before you've even walked up the fairway.
Where It Actually Worked
Mid-length par 4s, somewhere between 370 and 410 yards, were where this genuinely changed my round. On a 385-yard hole I played three times that month, driver left me 145 one round and 160 the next depending on wind — both numbers I don't fully trust. A hybrid off the tee left almost exactly 150 every single time, because the shorter shot took the variables that mess with driver distance mostly out of play.
Short par 4s under 340 yards were a wash. I'm inside my number no matter what I hit off the tee, so the rule barely applied — the only benefit there was not overswinging on a tee shot that didn't need it. Long par 4s past 440 and par-5 second shots were the opposite problem: I can't reach my number in two no matter what I do, so the plan simply doesn't have anything to offer on those holes, and pretending otherwise was how I talked myself into bad decisions in the first two rounds. Par 3s and true three-shot par 5s have their own separate logic entirely — I've written up par-3 strategy for high handicappers and par-5 strategy when you can't reach in two on their own, and neither one needed a 150-yard number to work.
Where It Fell Apart
The rules didn't survive contact with every hole, and pretending they did would make this a worse article. Some tee shots turned into a longer negotiation with myself than they needed to — standing over the ball running numbers instead of just picking a club and going, which is the exact habit I usually tell people to avoid. On a couple of holes I burned through more time than I should have, and I know it because Mike started counting my practice swings out loud on the back nine of round three.
There's also a hazard problem the rules don't solve. On our par-4 3rd, my number lands almost exactly on top of a fairway bunker, so "play to 150" and "play safe" were suddenly opposite instructions on the same hole. I had to build a second, smaller rule on the fly — when your number sits on trouble, you find the next-best number instead, even if it means a club you don't love as much. And there's the plain ego cost: fewer big swings off the tee means fewer of the moments the group actually notices. Nobody high-fives you for a smart 3-wood.
Slowing the group down is the one I take most seriously, because it isn't really my problem to create for four other guys. By round two I gave myself a hard rule inside the rule — decide the club before I get to the tee marker, based on the yardage sheet, not standing over the ball. That single change did more for pace than anything else in the whole experiment, and it's the same instinct behind playing ready golf in general — decide early, hit when it's your turn, keep the day moving for everyone in the group, not just yourself.
Wind broke the plan more than anything else did. Round three was gusting hard enough that a normally reliable club-to-number pairing was off by fifteen or twenty yards depending on which way I was facing, and I spent two holes trying to force the same club selection I'd used the week before in calm conditions. That's the one adjustment I'd tell anyone trying this to make going in — the number is the target, but the club that gets you there changes with the weather, and stubbornly keeping the same club regardless of wind defeats the entire point of the exercise. All of it folds into the same broader course-management habits that matter more at a 20-handicap than another lesson on swing mechanics would.
📋 What Actually Happened When I Tried the 150-Marker Plan
- 😤 Before: Standing over approach shots at awkward in-between yardages, guessing between two clubs more often than I'd admit
- 💡 The experiment: Four Saturday rounds, every tee shot and layup built around leaving myself the same trusted number
- 🎯 What changed: Fewer blow-up holes on the mid-length par 4s, more approach shots hit from a swing I actually trust — no real change on the very short or very long holes
- 🏌️ The verdict: Worth keeping on the holes where it applies, and just as important — worth dropping on the holes where it doesn't
Does This Actually Lower Your Score?
Mike's version of this question, asked on the drive home after round two, was less polite: "You're basically just playing not to lose." That's a fair read of what it looks like from the cart. Here's the direct answer — it doesn't add strokes anywhere, and on the holes where I had a real club decision to make, it took them away.
Across the four rounds, the number that actually moved wasn't birdies — I didn't make more of those, and I wasn't expecting to. It was the score-wrecking holes. Three fewer double bogeys over four rounds isn't a transformation, but it's the difference between a round I complain about at the 19th hole and one I don't mention at all. The plan doesn't make you better at golf. It makes you better at avoiding the specific kind of bad decision that turns a bogey into something worse — which, at our level, is most of where the extra strokes actually come from anyway. It's the same logic behind aiming for the middle of the green instead of the flag — you're removing the decision most likely to hurt you, not chasing the one that might occasionally help you.
It also changes what a round feels like, which matters more than Mike's version of the question gives it credit for. I spent less of the round standing over the ball second-guessing a yardage and more of it just executing a swing I've hit a thousand times at the range. That's not nothing. Some Saturdays, the whole goal is getting off the course still liking the guy you played golf with, and a calmer round does more for that than three fewer double bogeys ever could.
I told Mike all of this on the ride home after round four, expecting him to concede the point. He didn't — he pointed out, fairly, that a guy who already hits fairways doesn't need a plan built around avoiding an in-between number, because he never sees one. He's right, and it's the honest edge of this whole test: the strategy is solving a very specific problem, not making anyone a better ball-striker. If your problem on the course isn't club selection, this plan has nothing to sell you.
Who Should Try This (and Who Shouldn't)
This plan is built for a specific kind of golfer, and I don't think it's for everyone in the group. If you're wild off the tee, or if you find yourself standing over approach shots constantly torn between two clubs, this gives you a decision framework that removes the guessing entirely — you already know the answer before you get to the ball. Newer players without a full set of memorized yardages benefit the most, because it forces you to learn one number cold instead of vaguely knowing all fourteen clubs.
It's less useful if you already hit fairways consistently and rarely face an awkward in-between number — you're already getting the benefit this plan is trying to manufacture. It's also not for the guy in your group who plays for the one big drive every round and would rather have that feeling than three extra strokes saved. That's a legitimate way to enjoy a Saturday too. I just happen to think most bogey golfers are losing more strokes to bad numbers than they're gaining in satisfaction from a driver they can't consistently find the fairway with anyway.
It's also worth trying for exactly one round before committing a whole month to it, the way I did. One round tells you almost immediately whether your problem is club selection or something else entirely — if you're already finding greens and the plan barely changes your club choices, you've learned that in eighteen holes instead of four Saturdays, and you can go back to playing the way you were playing with nothing lost. If you want to see what else has held up under an honest test at our level, the full Tested by a Bogey Golfer series has the rest of them.
⛳ The 150-Marker Cheat Sheet
- 🔧 Find your own number first — it's whichever full swing you never doubt mid-swing, not necessarily 150
- ⭐ Pick your tee club based on the number it leaves, not on distance — even if that means leaving driver in the bag
- 🚫 Skip the plan entirely on holes too long to reach your number — forcing it just invites a bad decision
- 💡 Decide the club before you reach the tee marker, not while standing over the ball, to keep pace with your group
- ✅ When your number sits on a hazard, find the next-best number instead — the plan bends around trouble, it doesn't ignore it
🏌️ Got a Golf Story?
Share it with us. Every story we publish earns the author a free copy of The Weekend Golfer's Social Playbook — our three-step system for finding your people, running trips that actually come together, and earning the right to brag at the 19th hole.
Or join the Golfeasers — free weekly content for people like us.
More Honest Tests From an Average Game
- I Tried the Viral Swing Tip for 30 Days — another month-long test from the same series
- What I've Tested, Ranked — every experiment so far, sorted by what was actually worth the month
- I Stopped Reading Putts for a Month — the strategy-test cousin of this one, on the green instead of off the tee
- I Played One Ball for an Entire Month — another self-imposed rule that changed how a round felt
- I Used a Rangefinder for the First Time as a Bogey Golfer — for anyone who wants to find their own number the easy way
Questions About Playing to a Number
What if my trusted club isn't an 8-iron and doesn't go 150? Then your number isn't 150 — it's whatever your most reliable full swing actually carries. The strategy is about picking one club you never doubt and building the hole around it, not about matching a specific yardage. Test a few range sessions to find which iron you hit the same way every time, and use that number instead.
Does this work on par 3s? Not really, and I built that into the rules from the start. Par 3s already hand you a fixed number with no tee-shot decision involved, so there's nothing for this strategy to change — normal club selection for the yardage in front of you is still the right call.
Is this just a fancier way of saying "lay up more"? Partly, but it's more specific than that. Laying up generally means playing short of trouble; this is about laying up to a precise number you can execute a full, confident swing from, which is a different decision than just "hit it shorter."
Will this slow down my group? It can, if you let yourself stand over the ball deciding club by club. The fix is deciding before you reach the tee — check the yardage sheet, pick the club, and stick with it, the same discipline that makes ready golf work for everyone in the group.
Do I need a rangefinder or GPS to do this? It helps, but most courses already mark 100, 150, and 200 with stakes, discs, or colored posts, so you can run this test with nothing more than paying attention to what's already on the ground.
How long before this actually feels normal instead of forced? Give it a full round before you judge it, and a full month before you decide it isn't for you. The first round felt like a math problem on every tee; by round three I wasn't consciously thinking about it anymore, I was just reaching for the club that made sense.
Johnny is a 25-year weekend golfer who's double-booked tee times, forgotten his clubs an hour from the course, and made pretty much every other trip-planning mistake there is — so you don't have to. Guided by The Golfeaser Manifesto, he started Golfeaser.com to prove that weekend golfers are a special, funnier breed who improve the experience, not just the scorecard. He's also the guy behind The Weekend Golfer's Social Playbook — a three-step system for finding your people, running trips that actually come together, and earning the right to brag at the 19th hole.
